Judge asked to lift federal protections on wolves
March 24, 2011
SeattlePI.com
By MATT VOLZ
ASSOCIATED PRESS
MISSOULA, Mont. — Ten conservation groups and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service asked a federal judge Thursday to approve their plan to lift endangered species protections for wolves in Montana and Idaho, effectively reversing his previous rulings on the matter.
But four other conservation groups who splintered from the plaintiffs told U.S. District Judge Donald Molloy the proposed settlement is driven by politics, not science, and will hurt the species before it has fully recovered.
“If the settlement agreement is entered, one thing is clear: hundreds of wolves will die,” said Jay Tutchton, attorney for two of the groups.
Molloy said he would rule soon on whether to recommend the proposed deal to the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, which has jurisdiction over the case since Molloy ruled for the plaintiffs last August and the federal government appealed.
If he does recommend it, or says it raises serious questions, the appellate court would then remand the case back to Molloy and he would make a final ruling.
Post your comment
Comment Guidelines: We welcome your expressions of opinion on this subject. Please avoid false commentary about individuals or groups. Facts must be verified by the person posting. Off-topic comments, and comments inappropriate for a readership of all ages, may be deleted. E-mail addresses will never be published. Only comments with valid e-mail address will be published.
1 Comments
On March 25, 2011, Catherine Burt wrote:
Utah thinks that even as many as gasp 15 or 20 wolves in the state… is too many. Our politicians are working very hard to delist wolves, though most of the public is against this. We often wonder who the politicians are representing, because it isn’t the voters.