On Australia's 2005 Animal Cloning Proposal
November 10, 2005 | view comments (2) | add yours
This month, Friends of Animals responded to Australia’s National Health and Medical Research Council’s request for submissions regarding their “Draft Guidelines for the Creation, Breeding, Care and Use of Genetically Modified and Cloned Animals for Scientific Purposes.” The prepared PDF document is available for download, or you may opt instead to read it online. .
Excerpt:
In this submission we formally respond to the National Health and Medical Research Council’s “Animal Welfare Committee’s Guidelines for the creation, breeding, care and use of genetically modified and cloned animals for scientific purposes, Draft consultation document 2005” (hereinafter “Draft Guidelines”).
The “integrity” and the “nature” of nonhuman animals may be affected by genetic modification or cloning, observes the Council in the Preamble to the Guidelines. Changes may include how such animals interact with other animals and the environment. The Council states: “Such changes (both expected and unexpected) have major ethical significance.”
We agree, and believe that Australia should follow that statement to its logical conclusion, and disallow the cloning of nonhuman as well as human beings. We further state that genetic modification of nonhuman beings for human purposes is ethically unacceptable, for the reasons below.
Post your comment
Comment Guidelines: We welcome your expressions of opinion on this subject. Please avoid false commentary about individuals or groups. Facts must be verified by the person posting. Off-topic comments, and comments inappropriate for a readership of all ages, may be deleted. E-mail addresses will never be published. Only comments with valid e-mail address will be published.
2 Comments
On September 22, 2006, jessica wrote:
What are the reasons that you think that cloning is unethical?
On September 23, 2006, Friends of Animals wrote:
All the same ethical objections to cloning human beings apply to cloning nonhuman beings.
Moreover, there is no way a nonhuman being can give consent to be cloned let alone to be born as a clone. To clone other animals is to manipulate them because we think it is beneficial in some way to do so, not because they think so.
Above all, cloners are working for the multi-billion dollar agribusiness sectors. The patents granted to the creators of Dolly the sheep now belong to ViaGen, a Texas corporation that produces cloned pigs and cows in order to advertise juicier steaks and tastier chops, and dairy cattle capable of huge milk yields.
Lee Hall.